Question of the Day: If you could change the DVC expiration model to a rolling 50-year term from your specific purchase date, would you prefer that over the current fixed-end-date association model?
If you could change the DVC expiration model to a rolling 50-year term from your specific purchase date, would you prefer that over the current fixed-end-date association model?
Members are debating the benefits of rolling expiration dates to avoid the 2042-style sunset crises and maximize contract value.
If you could change the DVC expiration model to a rolling 50-year term from your specific purchase date, would you prefer that over the current fixed-end-date association model?
22 voters
Would love it if my Beach Club contract ran for longer - even people who bought it before BCV opened only got 40 years.
If there were a way to extend a contract and add years that would be awesome too!
🗺️ DVC Member Since 2019
Home Resorts: 🏢 Bay Lake Tower, 🏝️ Beach Club Villas, 🫖 Villas at Grand Floridian & 🌲 Villas at Grand Californian
I am torn but voted yes because I think it would create more value for everyone who purchases direct points to get the same duration.
I also think this still provides valve for resale contracts where you could get a contract at a lower price per point for less remaining years or a longer contract still at a discount from direct costs for the same property.
I just don't see where any of the 2042 properties will have value inside of 10 years left unless they drop to almost nothing per point to buy similar to what is already happening with Vero and Hilton Head on the resale market.